Thursday, September 16, 2010

Michael Moore : Iraq was invaded because Liberal Fools approved and applauded that Idiotic Invasion : New York Times, the Atlantic, the New Republic,

.
Michael Moore : Iraq was invaded because Liberal Fools approved and applauded that Idiotic Invasion : New York Times, the Atlantic, the New Republic, the New Yorker, MSNBC, Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, Al Franken, etc... etc ...


When the Iraq War started there was no way for AntiWar Activists to communicate with each other aside from through the Nation and a few websites like CommonDreams.org and Truth-Out.org.

When this war started, there was no YouTube, no Facebook, no Twitter, no way for you to bypass the media lords so you could have your own say.


Huffington Post

Never Forget: Bad Wars Aren't Possible Unless Good People Back Them
By Michael Moore
September 15, 2010

Never Forget: Bad Wars Aren't Possible Unless Good People Back Them


Some excerpts :

I know we've been "free" of the Iraq War for two weeks now and our minds have turned to the new football season and Fashion Week in New York. And how exciting that the new fall TV season is just days away!

But before we get too far away from something we would all just like to forget, will you please allow me to just say something plain and blunt and necessary:

We invaded Iraq because most Americans -- including good liberals like Al Franken, Nicholas Kristof & Bill Keller of the New York Times, David Remnick of the New Yorker, the editors of the Atlantic and the New Republic, Harvey Weinstein, Hillary Clinton, Chuck Schumer and John Kerry -- wanted to.
................

Then MSNBC fired the only nightly critic of the war -- the television legend, Phil Donahue. No one at the network -- or any network -- spoke up on his behalf. There would never again be a Phil Donahue show.
...............

** The New Yorker, the magazine for really smart liberals, found its editor-in-chief, David Remnick, supporting the war on its pages: "History will not easily excuse us if, by deciding not to decide, we defer a reckoning with an aggressive totalitarian leader who intends not only to develop weapons of mass destruction but also to use them... a return to a hollow pursuit of containment will be the most dangerous option of all." (To cover its ass, the New Yorker had another editor, Rick Hertzberg, write an anti-war editorial as a rebuttal.)
.

No comments:

Post a Comment