Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Jonathan Chait examines the Great Historical Crisis of the GOP during the times of Obama. Fear of Republican extinction because of adverse demographies. Every year, the nonwhite proportion of the electorate grows by about half a percentage point

.
In every presidential election, the minority share of the vote increases by 2 percent, a huge amount in a closely divided country" :

Fears of the GOP : "Along with illegal immigrants, low-income Americans and young people loom large as illegitimate consumers of public benefits and services."


New York Magazine
2012 or Never
Republicans are worried this election could be their last chance to stop history. This is fear talking. But not paranoia.
By Jonathan Chait

Published Feb 26, 2012

2012 or Never


Some excerpts :

“America is approaching a ‘tipping point’ beyond which the Nation will be unable to change course,” announces the dark, old-timey preamble to Paul Ryan’s “The Roadmap Plan,” a statement of fiscal principles that shaped the budget outline approved last spring by 98 percent of the House Republican caucus. Rick Santorum warns his audiences, “We are reaching a tipping point, folks, when those who pay are the minority and those who receive are the majority.” Even such a sober figure as Mitt Romney regularly says things like “We are only inches away from no longer being a free economy,” and that this election “could be our last chance.”
......................

The modern GOP—the party of Nixon, Reagan, and both Bushes—is staring down its own demographic extinction. Right-wing warnings of impending tyranny express, in hyperbolic form, well-grounded dread: that conservative America will soon come to be dominated, in a semi-permanent fashion, by an ascendant Democratic coalition hostile to its outlook and interests. And this impending doom has colored the party’s frantic, fearful response to the Obama presidency.
........................

The Republican Party had increasingly found itself confined to white voters, especially those lacking a college degree and rural whites who, as Obama awkwardly put it in 2008, tend to “cling to guns or religion.” Meanwhile, the Democrats had ­increased their standing among whites with graduate degrees, particularly the growing share of secular whites, and remained dominant among racial minorities. As a whole, Judis and Teixeira noted, the electorate was growing both somewhat better educated and dramatically less white, making every successive election less favorable for the GOP. And the trends were even more striking in some key swing states. Judis and Teixeira highlighted Colorado, Nevada, and Arizona, with skyrocketing Latino populations, and Virginia and North Carolina, with their influx of college-educated whites, as the most fertile grounds for the expanding Democratic base.
.............

But the dominant fact of the new Democratic majority is that it has begun to overturn the racial dynamics that have governed American politics for five decades. Whatever its abstract intellectual roots, conservatism has since at least the sixties drawn its political strength by appealing to heartland identity politics. In 1985, Stanley Greenberg, then a political scientist, immersed himself in Macomb County, a blue-collar Detroit suburb where whites had abandoned the Democratic Party in droves. He found that the Reagan Democrats there understood politics almost entirely in racial terms, translating any Democratic appeal to economic justice as taking their money to subsidize the black underclass. And it didn’t end with the Reagan era. Piles of recent studies have found that voters often conflate “social” and “economic” issues. What social scientists delicately call “ethnocentrism” and “racial resentment” and “ingroup solidarity” are defining attributes of conservative voting behavior, and help organize a familiar if not necessarily rational coalition of ideological interests.
................

Portents of this future were surely rendered all the more vivid by the startling reality that the man presiding over the new majority just happened to be, himself, young, urban, hip, and black. When jubilant supporters of Obama gathered in Grant Park on Election Night in 2008, Republicans saw a glimpse of their own political mortality. And a galvanizing picture of just what their new rulers would look like.
..............

Following Obama’s win, all sorts of loose talk concerning the Republican predicament filled the air. How would the party recast itself? Where would it move left, how would it find common ground with Obama, what new constituencies would it court?

The most widely agreed-upon component of any such undertaking was a concerted effort to win back the Hispanic vote. It seemed like a pure political no-brainer, a vital outreach to an exploding electoral segment that could conceivably be weaned from its Democratic leanings, as had previous generations of Irish and Italian immigrants, without altering the party’s general right-wing thrust on other issues. George W. Bush had tried to cobble together a comprehensive immigration-reform policy only to see it collapse underneath a conservative grassroots revolt, and John McCain, who had initially co-sponsored a bill in the Senate, had to withdraw his support for it in his pursuit of the 2008 nomination.

In the wake of his defeat, strategists like Karl Rove and Mike Murphy urged the GOP to abandon its stubborn opposition to reform. Instead, incredibly, the party adopted a more hawkish position, with Republicans in Congress rejecting even quarter-loaf compromises like the Dream Act and state-level officials like Jan Brewer launching new restrictionist crusades. This was, as Thomas Edsall writes in The Age of Austerity, “a major gamble that the GOP can continue to win as a white party despite the growing strength of the minority vote.”

None of this is to say that Republicans ignored the rising tide of younger and browner voters that swamped them at the polls in 2008. Instead they set about keeping as many of them from the polls as possible. The bulk of the campaign has taken the form of throwing up an endless series of tedious bureaucratic impediments to voting in many states—ending same-day voter registration, imposing onerous requirements upon voter-registration drives, and upon voters themselves. “Voting liberal, that’s what kids do,” overshared William O’Brien, the New Hampshire House speaker, who had supported a bill to prohibit college students from voting from their school addresses. What can these desperate, rearguard tactics accomplish? They can make the electorate a bit older, whiter, and less poor. They can, perhaps, buy the Republicans some time.
...................

The way to make sense of that foolhardiness is that the party has decided to bet everything on its one “last chance.” Not the last chance for the Republican Party to win power—there will be many of those, and over time it will surely learn to compete for nonwhite voters—but its last chance to exercise power in its current form, as a party of anti-government fundamentalism powered by sublimated white Christian identity politics. (And the last chance to stop the policy steamroller of the new Democratic majority.) And whatever rhetorical concessions to moderates and independents the eventual Republican nominee may be tempted to make in the fall, he’ll find himself fairly boxed in by everything he’s already done this winter to please that base.
..............

On the other hand, if they lose their bid to unseat Obama, they will have mortgaged their future for nothing at all. And over the last several months, it has appeared increasingly likely that the party’s great all-or-nothing bet may land, ultimately, on nothing. In which case, the Republicans will have turned an unfavorable outlook into a truly bleak one in a fit of panic. The deepest effect of Obama’s election upon the Republicans’ psyche has been to make them truly fear, for the first time since before Ronald Reagan, that the future is against them.
..............

Monday, February 27, 2012

Do you want American Preeminence and Power ?? - American World Dominance in Busisness and other matters ?? - Foreign Policy Magazine : Charles Kenny explains why it is better to be careful kicking out Latinos, that is a labor force that America needs for preeminence

.
Make more Americans in the uterus or import them : America needs imported young scientists and entrepreneurs, but also gardeners, nurses, agricultural labor, construction workers, etc...

The need of Young Blood for America. It is cheaper to produce babies in the Third World than in America. So Mitt Romney has it wrong wanting to kick out 5 million Latinos in his four years of first term presidency.


Go Forth and Multiply
Want to stop the slide in U.S. dominance? Make more Americans.
FEBRUARY 27, 2012

BY CHARLES KENNY

Charles Kenny is a senior fellow at the Center for Global Development. His current work covers topics including the demand side of development, the role of technology in quality of life improvements, and governance and anticorruption in aid. He has published articles, chapters and books on issues including progress towards the Millennium Development Goals, what we know about the causes of economic growth, the link between economic growth and broader development, the causes of improvements in global health, the link between economic growth and happiness, the end of the Malthusian trap, the role of communications technologies in development, the ‘digital divide,’ and corruption.

He is a contributing editor at Foreign Policy magazine and a Schwartz Fellow at the New America Foundation. Kenny was previously at the World Bank, where his assignments included working with the VP for the Middle East and North Africa Region, coordinating work on governance and anticorruption in infrastructure and natural resources, and managing a number of investment and technical assistance projects covering telecommunications and the Internet.

Charles Kenny is also an author, most recently, of Getting Better: Why Global Development is Succeeding and How We Can Improve the World Even More. "The Optimist," his column for ForeignPolicy.com, runs weekly.

Charles Kenny keeps a personal blog at http://www.charleskenny.blogs.com



Go Forth and Multiply


Some excerpts :

But increasing migration has other benefits for native-born Americans beyond extending the psychological comfort of holding onto the status of world's most powerful economy. Not only is there evidence against the theory that immigrants take jobs from the native-born, but they also do jobs that there won't be native-born people around to handle. As the average age of Americans climbs over the next 20 years, the U.S. Census Bureau suggests that the number of people age 65 or over will climb from 22 percent to 35 percent of the working-age population. Add in kids, and that means every 100 people of working age will be supporting 83 people above or below working age by 2030. Want to keep the cost of greens fees down for all those retirees? Import some gardeners from poorer countries. The lower cost of services provided by immigrants will also help shrink the gap with China when it comes to economic strength measured in purchasing power parity (when you adjust income measures for the different cost of goods and services across countries).

If more labor is the secret to continued American global economic dominance, there is one course other than importing it -- expanding domestic production. Paying people to get pregnant can work. But, frankly, this is a case where there is a huge advantage to outsourcing. Domestic production is very high-cost. The average expenditure to raise a child to age 18 in the United States is $227,000, according to the U.S. Agriculture Department. That's the same cost as raising 34 kids living on a dollar a day to their 18th birthday in the developing world. Furthermore, importing people rather than Americans making them themselves means that there are fewer of them left in other countries. All else being equal, that means aggregate output in other countries grows more slowly (not only directly, but because migrant remittances are associated with declining birth rates). In turn, that extends America's run of global economic dominance.

If population is power, China shot itself in the foot with its one-child policy. If it had twice the population but the same income it has now, there would be little question of the country's economic dominance. This makes you wonder whether perhaps the U.S. foreign-policy establishment hadn't already figured out all this years ago. U.S. Defense Secretary Robert McNamara, for example, went straight from the Pentagon to the World Bank, where he was a powerful proponent of family planning. His work at the development organization may have done more to preserve America's relative global strength than all the military buildup he orchestrated at the Defense Department.

And that means all those national security hawks who want to build a fence across America's southern border have it exactly backward. Preserving America's preeminence takes opening the gates wide. It's the only way to ensure that, in 2050, Americans can still proclaim: "We're No. 1!" Or, if the strategy is working really well, "Somos el número uno!"
......

The President of Chile ( a very wealthy man ) caressing a baby : "Improving the race with blond blue-eyed babies". He is the Chilean Version of Newt Gingrich ! - Stupid joke.... He is very rich in gold but not in wisdom. -- See video

.
This guy is reported to be a "Pinochetista", that is a fan of Dictator Pinochet.


This would be disgraceful, inexcusable and unpardonable in the most backward country of this planet, but I constantly hear that Chile is making strides to enter the exclusive club of Rich countries.



ANGELINO.CL - Presidente Piñera en Los Ángeles y sus dichos "mejorando la raza"


Uploaded by webangelino on Feb 24, 2012


ANGELINO.CL - LOS ÁNGELES EN INTERNET
#mejorandolaraza es trending topic en Twitter, luego de dichos de Presidente Sebastián Piñera efectuara en la ciudad de Los Ángeles en el marco de la visita a varias ciudades afectadas por el terremoto de 2010, en palabras expresadas al Diputado Joel Rosales señala "lo felicito, hizo una gran labor... mejorando la raza"... adjuntamos video para que se forme su propia opinión.


ANGELINO.CL - Presidente Piñera en Los Ángeles y sus dichos "mejorando la raza"



......

Sunday, February 26, 2012

Mitt Romney in talks over nationwide version of tough state immigration laws. - Immigration adviser Kris Kobach, the man behind controversial 'self-deportation' laws in Arizona and Alabama, says policy could force out 5 million illegal immigrants in just four years

.
British "Guardian" Newspaper
Mitt Romney to kick out 5 million illegal immigrants in just four years
By Ed Pilkington in Topeka, Kansas
Friday, February 24, 2012


Mitt Romney to kick out 5 million illegal immigrants in just four years


Some excerpts :

Mitt Romney has discussed the possibility of imposing a nationwide crackdown on undocumented aliens, a move that his leading immigration adviser believes could force more than a million people to quit the country every year.

Kris Kobach, the source of some of Romney's most controversial ideas on immigration, has told the Guardian that he has been in direct discussions with the presidential candidate about possible changes to federal policy should Romney win the Republican nomination and go on to take the White House.

The changes would see "attrition through enforcement" – the state-level clampdown pioneered by Kobach in Arizona, Alabama and several other states – extended across the entire US in an attempt to winkle undocumented workers out of the country.

Kobach estimates that within the first four years of a new Republican presidency, as many as half of the current pool of undocumented aliens – some 5.5 million – could be made to flee by introducing much more aggressive enforcement of immigration documents.

The idea is to make the legal environment so hostile to undocumented families, and work so hard to come by, that they will choose to depart of their own volition – "self-deportation", as Kobach calls it.
..............

Saturday, February 25, 2012

Understanding Mitt Romney as a Mormon Narcissistic Selfish Egoistic antiScientific Materialistic Creature : The Business of Mormonism is Business : Mormons do not pursue Science and Art. Mormon Women are castrated in a kitchen and reproduction. "Mormonism equates material success with righteousness"

.
Mitt Romney : the Egolater Self-Adorer made for Success in Material Pursuits :



"They all seem to have the same narcissistic personality traits. These people are all about outdoing society and controling their environment. Their children tend to be naive, sheltered, and on a short leash. They all will most likely go to Brigham Young University Provo". ( just like Mitt Romney ).

"Mormon Isolation in Education to protect the Children from the outside World". Mormonism is a Great Enemy of Science. "A power structure that claims absolute, divine authority over every aspect of life doesn't exactly inspire people to trust themselves". ( Something necessary in Science and Art ).

"Everyone is strongly encouraged to put themselves in the best position to serve and contribute as early as possible. A profession becomes a means to an end, and that end is material prosperity. Because this life is just a blip on the eternity continuum, what you accomplish in mortality is trivial compared to how well you position yourself for the next life".

The Richest Mormons : "Some of these homes contain a home schooling classroom because all the children are home schooled or are taught by private tutors. These people seem to love oak and kind of a homey Utah look is always prevalent in the large kitchen and unformal dining area. If the children aren't home schooled they go to either charter schools or private schools".




My Own Questions :

Is this what America should be in the Future ?? - A bunch of egoistic narcissists dedicated to material purposes, to the pursuit of riches and power ??, but denying Science, Knowledge, Wisdom, Art, Humanity, Compassion, Humanity, Nobility, Kindness and Mercy ??

Is this what the Republican Party wants to be ?? - Is this what the Republican Party has to offer in year 2012 to America and the World ??

I wrote this with the help of this website :




Salamander Society



More Mormon Musings and Memories


***************************

Friday, February 24, 2012

Robert Shrum : "Mitt Romney is pandering so desperately to the far-right fringe that he's become all but unelectable in November" - "In the Arizona debate, he may have stanched his bleeding in the primaries, but he opened his veins for November"

.
"By all accounts, Mitt Romney won what may be the last Republican presidential debate. Little good it will do him if in the process he suffers the loss of the general election".


The Week
The increasingly worthless GOP nomination
Mitt Romney is pandering so desperately to the far-right fringe that he's become all but unelectable in November
February 23, 2012

By Robert Shrum
Robert Shrum was a senior adviser on Al Gore's 2000 presidential campaign and chief strategist for John Kerry's 2004 campaign. He has advised 30 winning U.S. Senate campaigns and eight winning campaigns for governor.

The increasingly worthless GOP nomination

Some excerpts :

Mitt Romney won the Arizona Debate :

It will be a negative victory for a mediocre politician. Halperin accorded Romney a middling B- for his debate performance. He was artificial as usual, stiff even while sitting in a chair instead of mechanically gesturing from a podium. He was a snarky know-it-all talking down to his opponents and CNN's John King. At any moment, he looked as if he was about to turn to Santorum and say, "You're fired." It was as if the office of the presidency was a codicil in his trust fund.

Romney's campaign, with superior resources and organization, packed the room with a claque that applauded on cue. But on television, the candidate continued his long march toward an image as unlikable as it is inauthentic. As the longtime political strategist and LGBT leader David Mixner observed to me, Romney came across as "everyone's boss." A months-long series of verbal missteps into indifference and callousness toward ordinary Americans, combined with the pressure in the primaries to move hard right, have already scarred Romney's favorability ratings with independents and general election voters. Among women, for example, the new Quinnipiac survey shows him with a net unfavorable of -15 percent.

Therein lies the potentially fatal weakness that goes beyond the well-coiffed candidate's starched persona. As he demonstrated in this debate, he's so desperate to pander his way to the nomination that he's making it increasingly worthless.
.................

This may do for the primary — it may be essential — but it's a disaster in the making for the fall campaign. Romney's cynical hope has to be that his shape-shifting will convince voters he doesn't really mean this stuff. He can pray that his character weakness is his saving grace — that his reputation for lying about his beliefs will pull him back from the edge of a gender gap that will otherwise pose an unbridgeable barrier to the White House. The longer the primaries drag on, and the more he has to profess his hostility to women's rights, the less likely it is that he can ever convince the majority who are women to take a chance on him.
...........

But let's not stop there — because Romney's panderathon didn't. He praised Arizona's ethnic-profiling immigration law as a "model" for the nation. By November, this appeal to the Tea Party will ferment into political hemlock. As Karl Rove correctly calculated, a Republican nominee can't prevail without claiming about 40 percent of the Hispanic vote. George W. Bush got just enough — 44 percent — in his close re-election battle with John Kerry. Afterwards, Bush joined with Ted Kennedy and John McCain in an effort to enact immigration reform. The congressional GOP and the grassroots rebelled; McCain, facing the same xenophobia that suffuses this year's primary electorate, recanted. Republicans sounded like throwbacks to the Know-Nothings who spewed venom and violence against Catholic immigrants in the 19th century.

On his way to losing the presidency, McCain won just 31 percent of Hispanics. In an ABC News/Latino Decisions for Univision News poll, only 25 percent now favor Romney over Obama. In the Arizona debate, Romney surely eroded even that.
................

This is not the GOP that has won in the past — where a grace note has modulated the mobilization of the base. The allegedly war-mongering Ronald Reagan, in his 1980 debate with Jimmy Carter, pledged to reduce and not use nuclear weapons — and it turned out that he meant it, to the consternation of the neocons. The first George Bush called for "a kinder, gentler" conservatism; the second for "compassionate conservatism" — even if it turned out he didn't mean it. In contrast, Romney boasts of a "severely" conservative ideology; as he kowtows to the right wing on social issues and immigration, he signals that he would tear us apart. And if the economy continues to improve, he's painting himself into a narrow electoral corner. The party of "no" may be about to select a nominee with "no exit" into the mainstream.
...............

Thursday, February 23, 2012

Associated Press Poll : Very Ominous for the Republican Party : "Interest in the Primaries is slipping : Just 40 percent of Republicans say they have a great deal of interest in following the contest, compared with 48 percent in December. 6 in 10 independents would choose Obama over any of the Republicans"

.
Obama tops 50 percent support when matched against each of the four GOP candidates and holds a significant lead over each of them, according to the Associated Press-GfK poll.

It is also very menacing and alarming for GOP that the Turnout in the primaries is in general lower than in year 2008 for the Republican Party. This can only predict disaster for the GOP.




Associated Press
Poll: Santorum surges, Obama leads Republicans
By LAURIE KELLMAN and JENNIFER AGIESTA
Associated Press
Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Poll: Santorum surges, Obama leads Republicans

******************************

Wednesday, February 22, 2012

VIDEO : Mitt Romney's Mormon Cartoon: Proudly Teaching You His Religion.mp4 - Extreme anti-Christian Fantasies, this can not be more anti-Christian, denying 2,000 years of Christianity and the New Testament teachings

.
Would you like the President of the USA believing all these fantasies and teachings that are supported by Mormon Scriptures ??. Nothing is added in these cartoons that Mormons don't teach as their dogma and Theology.


Uploaded by robertzjenkins on Dec 30, 2011

Mitt Romney would like us all to know more about his Mormon religion. This is why he has personally contributed a substantial percentage of his personal income to directly fund many Mormon Missionaries (you know the ones with white shirts and black ties on bicycles that come to your door?) to try to convert Americans and other people's to his religion. (All Mormons must give at least 10% to "further the work" of trying to convert you).

Per the LDS church: Gordon B. Hinckley, prior President of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, said: "Our major source of revenue is the ancient law of the tithe. Our people are expected to pay 10 percent of their income to move forward the work of the Church. The remarkable and wonderful thing is that they do it. Tithing is not so much a matter of dollars as it is a matter of faith. It becomes a privilege and an opportunity, not a burden. Our people believe in the word of God as set forth in the book of Malachi, that the Lord will open the windows of heaven and pour down blessings that there will not be room enough to receive them (Malachi 3:8-10). Moving and touching is the testimony of Latter-day Saints throughout the world concerning this the Lord's law for the financing of His work."

Mitt Romney's Mormon Cartoon: Proudly Teaching You His Religion.mp4




*****************************

Tuesday, February 21, 2012

VIDEO, Ed Schultz, Mike Papantonio, Goldie Taylor, Mitt Romney great Pork Barrel Spender, The Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City cost billions to the U. S. Taxpayer. - Mitt does not undersand the Labor Culture

.
The Winter Olympics were criticized by John McCain as a spending ugly obscene stravaganza.

The GOP alienates Minorities, Women, Immigrants, Blue Collar Workers. The GOP is an American Taliban.

Uploaded by golefttv on Feb 18, 2012

Mike Papantonio appears on MSNBC's The Ed Show to talk about Romney's Olympic hypocrisy, and Santorum's war against women.


Papantonio: The GOP Meltdown Continues




***********************

VIDEOS : Ardi, the Ardipithecus Ramidus ( 5 million years ago ), Sahelanthropus tchadensis Toumai ( 7 million years ago ), and Lucy, Australopithecus afarensis ( 4 millions ) were very pacific and happily married in monogamy and proto marriage

.
They were loyal, faithful and had a lot of fidelity to their sexual partners, happy couples. So Obama would be the best President in his second term. Explanation :

These hominid our ancestors were very pacific and happily married without divorce or mormon polygamy.

Scientists are telling us about the low dimorphism ( differences between the sexes ) of these proto humans, they had small canines and did not fight for sex, they had not alpha male and no sexual violence or male violence like those nasty chimps of today. No domestic brutality.

That is why we should all vote for Noble and Kind President Obama and not for a Party that is so inhuman and inhumane.

I want the peaceful progress of Toumai, Ardi and Lucy and not the violence of Chimps and Gorillas in Rage of Alpha Males.



Great Videos of our Great, Noble and Happily married Ancestors :



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tcrywnrwMyI

Science Magazine
The Analysis of Ardipithecus ramidus--One of the Earliest Known Hominids


Uploaded by wwwAAASorg on Oct 20, 2009

More than a million-years older than "Lucy," and the associated fossils provide the most detailed snapshot of early hominid life. This video features interviews with Project Co-Director Tim White (University of California, Berkeley), Science correspondent Ann Gibbons, and paleoanthropologist Andrew Hill (Yale University). Produced by Robert Frederick and Michael Torrice.


*********************


Discovering Ardi - How Ardi Walked - 10/11 @ 9pm E/P on Discovery

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pw_J6jV02eU


*************************


Ardi-Ardipithecus ramidus and human evolution

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5c5syi0124

******************************


Ardi, Oldest Relative Sheds New Light On Human Evolution

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cKs-i4_cPQ

*******************************

Discovering Ardi - Building Ardi's World - 10/11 @ 9pm E/P on Discovery

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vyBFnW-x_ns

*********************


http://genealogyreligion.net/pair-bonding-ritual-marriage

Pair Bonding & Ritual Marriage

***************************

“Reexamining Human Origins in Light of Ardipithecus ramidus”

Owen Lovejoy’s controversal conclusions that Ardipithecus was monogamous in its mating habits,



The pair-bond model of human origin proposed by Lovejoy in his “Reexamining Human Origins in Light of Ardipithecus ramidus” (2009) combines fossil records with the unique sexual behavior of modern humans. This construct, however, seems to lack an emotionally important element. By connecting ovulatory crypsis with frontal copulation and face-to-face contact, the transition to the complexity and subtlety of human emotional life becomes more evident. Reproductive success and emotional representation are considered as two interacting levels in the phylogenetic scale. Thus, the behavioral frame of sociobiology is extended to psychobiological phenomena and a bridge is built between natural sciences and philosophy. Light from both sides will be thrown on the origin of man, including his unique cultural history.


Young Turks
Oldest "Human Ancestor" Skeleton Discovered -- Evolution Rocks!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnSw8Dc4Gyo

.....

Monday, February 20, 2012

"The Atlantic" : Brits and Euros look at the GOP race as a way to demean Americans as racist hillbillies, intolerant religious fundamentalists listening to homophobic televangelists, Republicans as experts in Dog Whistling

.
My own Comment : The Republican Primaries would be a shame and embarrassment in the most backward country of this planet. These primaries are certainly a big fest of jingoism, chauvinism, hyper nationalism, racism, anti-ethnic prejudice, religious bigotry and hate for the Poor.


The Atlantic
How UK Coverage of the Presidential Race Feeds Anti-Americanism
British journalists seem determined to portray the Republican contest in oversimplified and distorted ways, reawakening familiar prejudices.
February 20, 2012

By Kiran Moodley - Kiran Moodley was born in London in 1987, to an English mother and a South African father. He attended a grammar school in north London, and then went up to Cambridge in 2006 to major in history. Kiran Moodley lives and works in London.

Current : Producer at Citywire Wealth Manager

Past : Campaign Intern at Labour Yes! to Fairer Votes, Desk Assistant at Public Broadcasting Service, Production Intern at Newsweek and The Daily Beast

Education : Columbia University - Graduate School of Journalism, Clare College, University of Cambridge, The Latymer School


How UK Coverage of the Presidential Race Feeds Anti-Americanism


Some excerpts :

Countless articles and videos, from journalists like Matthew Norman of The Independent and Gary Younge of The Guardian, have portrayed the Tea Party as hillbillies who firmly believe that Obama is a native of Kenya. For many in their audience, this resonates with a deep-seated sense of superiority to Americans. It's a common problem across Europe, according to Joseph Joffe, editor of Die Zeit. He notes that Europeans believe "America is the land of intolerant, fundamentalist religion, with screaming televangelists calling homosexuals Satan's semen-drenched acolytes, while Europe is charting a path toward enlightened secularism."

Commentary from Michael White of The Guardian on the January 19 Republican debate in South Carolina seems to confirm Joffe's take:

I watched Thursday's CNN-sponsored debate at Charleston, all flag-waving and heart-on-sleeve patriotism, more brawn than brain.... In their self-absorbed American way, the word China barely featured... blissfully ignorant that the best EU healthcare -- including the NHS -- delivers so much more for less than America's unfair and inefficient system. Who pays out most but still wins the Obesity Cup? Why, they do!
...............

More often, however, it is race and political extremism that captivate the British press. Every article on American politics now includes an obligatory paragraph on the Tea Party, the strong influence of the religious right, and the fractious state of American politics.
...........

Indeed, even the most minor story is pounced upon if it confirms the stereotype. For example, British media outlets were keen to give traction to an interview Piers Morgan conducted with Jimmy Carter -- little noticed at home -- in which the former president argued that Newt Gingrich was practicing veiled racism in South Carolina. Even The Economist emphasized the race angle:

Mr Gingrich engaged in some expert racial dog-whistling. He called Barack Obama the "food-stamp president" and accused him of declaring war on religion and traditional American values. He was not merely condescending to Juan Williams, the lone black moderator in the most recent debate, but effectively called him lazy at a campaign event. He then used this tussle as a campaign ad arguing that he could most effectively beat Mr Obama, who just happens to share the same skin color as Mr Williams. These attacks seemed to go down well with primary voters, who were 99% white.
...........

Nonetheless, British journalists have delighted in portraying the Republican race as representing the disintegration of U.S. politics.
.................

The Guardian's Jonathan Freedland proclaims that America is moving "towards an anti-government fervor that recalls the militia movement of the 1990s, convinced that every Washington move... is motivated by wickedness and constitutes a step towards tyranny."
...............

Sunday, February 19, 2012

What the Founding Fathers thought about Health Care : Congress passed and John Adams signed, a mandatory health care insurance law back in 1791. The mandate required sailors to pay a tax and in the event they needed care, they could get medical care from the government

.
If it was unconstitutional as Republicans claim, why didn’t Thomas Jefferson or James Madison repeal it? The fact is, they didn’t, and I’d say James Madison knew more about the Constitution than any Republican does, considering he’s the primary author of that sacred document.


Addicting Info Organization
20 Historical Facts That Republicans Distort Or Just Get Plain Wrong
By Stephen D. Foster Jr.
February 15, 2012


20 Historical Facts That Republicans Distort Or Just Get Plain Wrong


Some excerpts :

9. - Did The Founding Fathers Support A Strong Federal Government Or A Weak One?) This is an easy one. Republicans are dead wrong when they claim that the Founding Fathers wanted a weak federal government. And that is simple to prove. Before we had the Constitution, America was a loose alliance of states under the Articles of Confederation. Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government was weak. So weak in fact that it didn’t have the power to levy taxes, could not regulate commerce, and relied on the states to provide money for defense. The states had all the power and the federal government had virtually none. This was a chaotic system that threatened to tear apart the new nation. 

So the Founders wrote the Constitution which created a strong central government capable of levying taxes, regulating commerce, printing money, and forming a military. Most importantly, under the Constitution, the federal government was given the power to provide for the general welfare and the states were given far less power. Republicans will often cite the Tenth Amendment as proof of state supremacy but they’re wrong about that too. After the Constitution was ratified, some wanted to add an amendment limiting the federal government to powers “expressly” delegated, which would have denied implied powers. However, the word “expressly” ultimately did not appear in the Tenth Amendment as ratified, and therefore the Tenth Amendment did not reject the powers implied by the Necessary and Proper Clause. In other words, the federal government has the power to make laws about things that are not found in the Constitution such as health care.
.........

Saturday, February 18, 2012

President Scores Big Win : Renewal of the payroll tax cut for 160 million workers, they would continue to receive a 2 percentage point increase in their paychecks - People out of work for more than six months would keep jobless benefits averaging about $300 a week

.
Huffington Post
Obama Payroll Tax Cut: President Finally Scores Coveted Win
By ANDREW TAYLOR
February 18, 2012

Obama Payroll Tax Cut: President Finally Scores Coveted Win


Some excerpts :

WASHINGTON -- The $143 billion payroll tax cut won by President Barack Obama may be the last significant measure he receives from a deeply divided Congress that promises to only get more polarized as Election Day approaches.

Obama's coveted renewal of the payroll tax cut for 160 million workers and jobless benefits for millions more caps a five-month campaign-style drive against reluctant Republicans.

Under the bill Congress approved Friday, workers would continue to receive a 2 percentage point increase in their paychecks, and people out of work for more than six months would keep jobless benefits averaging about $300 a week, steps that Obama says will help support a fragile recovery from the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression.

It would also head off a steep cut in reimbursements for physicians who treat Medicare patients.

The tax cuts, jobless coverage and higher doctors' payments would all continue through 2012.

Passage of the legislation hands Obama a victory over objections from many GOP lawmakers who oppose it but were eager to wipe the issue from the election-year agenda.

It also clears away a political headache for House Republicans, who blocked a two-month extension of the tax cut and jobless coverage in late December, only to retreat quickly under a buzz saw of opposition from conservative and GOP leaders from around the country.

With that history, Republicans seemed ready to get the fight behind them and change the subject for the rest of this election year.

"We're dumb, but we're not stupid," Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., told reporters after he voted. "We did not want to repeat the debacle of last December. It's not that complicated."
.........

Friday, February 17, 2012

I feel very ashamed and embarrassed that these two guys exist and perform as presidents : Correa and Chavez. Add Daniel Ortega of Nicaragua, and I just want the earth to swallow me

.
I do not include Evo Morales of Bolivia because there are indian or indigenous things that I don't understand.


And Cuba is perhaps a gigantic an painful historic mistake that has to be repaired with some charity and understanding of all other nations.


I feel a lot of sadness and also shame of "Papa Doc" and "Baby Doc" in Haiti and their brutal police the "Tonton Macoutes".


.....

Vicente Duque

Data : Latino Voters in States : Latinos will turnout in record numbers in the next Presidential election, with at least 12.2 million casting ballots. The Latino vote will increase 26% from 2008, and Latinos will account for at least 8.7% of the country’s voters

.
NALEO.ORG
National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials (NALEO)
Educational Fund
The 2012 Latino Vote - Turning Numbers Into Clout
February 8, 2012

The 2012 Latino Vote - Turning Numbers Into Clout

Some Excerpts and Data :

By the 2012 election, approximately 2.4 million more U.S.-born Latinos will be older than 18 years old than in the 2008 election. Between 2004 and 2008, the turnout of eligible Latino voters age 18-24 increased from 33 percent to 39 percent, and in 2008, one in seven Latino voters was in that age group.


Projected Latino Voters

Increase From 2008

Projected Share of Latino Vote, Increase, Share of Latino Vote

NATIONAL 12,237,000     25.6%     8.7%
Arizona              359,000     23.2%   12.0%
California       3,911,000     32.1%    26.3%
Colorado           224,000     15.0%     8.7%
Florida            1,650,000     34.5%   18.3%
Illinois               433,000      37.8%     7.6%
New Jersey       392,000     16.2%    10.4%
New Mexico      329,000     14.0%    35.0%
New York           845,000     13.7%    10.8%
Texas               1,987,000     17.1%    21.3%

********************

Thursday, February 16, 2012

Good News : Jobless claims plunged last week to a nearly four-year low. - Initial unemployment claims totaled 348,000 in the week ended Feb. 11, U.S. Department of Labor, 13,000 less than the week before. And consumers are working their way toward more healthy balance sheets

.
Unemployment is steadily decreasing as consumers are strongly improving their finance situation. The household debt figures do not point to another recessionary dip, it's the opposite.

Morgan Housel ( The Motley Fool ) analyzes how "The numbers show that consumers truly are putting the bubble behind them, becoming stronger with each passing month as they deleverage and create a more sustainable, rational state of finances. That lowers the odds of another recession".



FOOL.COM
The Motley Fool
Believe It: Consumers Are Shedding Debt
By Morgan Housel
February 15, 2012

Believe It: Consumers Are Shedding Debt


Some excerpts :

While still a long way from victory (more on that in a minute), consumers are clearly deleveraging, relieving themselves of trillions of dollars in excessive debt accumulated over the last three decades. Far from falling off the debt wagon, consumers are working their way toward more healthy balance sheets. And they're doing a pretty good job of it.
...........

In the United States, contrary to conventional wisdom, the greatest increase in leverage occurred among middle-income households, not the poorest. Most borrowers who did not qualify for the prime mortgage category, in fact, were middle- and higher-income households with poor credit histories, or no down payments, or poor documentation of income -- not low-income households buying a house for the first time.

That should put a lot in perspective. A 2007 Federal Reserve report showed household leverage was nearly twice as high among those with incomes in the 80th percentile than those with incomes at the 20th percentile. That's important, because a cruel trend of the last three decades has been that those with lower incomes have seen real (inflation-adjusted) paychecks shrink, while those at the top of the heap have seen their incomes grow. Those with the most debt, in other words, likely have an easier time deleveraging since they are the ones with rising incomes -- important when wondering how consumers can handle debt when aggregate earnings are rising less than inflation.

Make no mistake: There's still a long way to go. McKinsey thinks households could be done deleveraging by the middle of next year. That could be optimistic. Some simple calculations show the economy as a whole could be deleveraging for another decade if we continue at the current pace.
..........

Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Are you better off than four years ago ? : Yes. because in 2008 there was a threat of a Big Depression like in 1930 - Obama saved America and the World - VIDEO : 1996 Presidential Debate Bill Clinton vs Bob Dole YouTube

.
Bill Clinton tells to Senator Bob Dole ( Republican Candidate ) during a Presidential Debate : "It is not midnight in America, Senator Dole - We are better off than four years ago". ( at the end of the video )


1996 Presidential Debate Bill Clinton vs Bob Dole YouTube





********************************

Tuesday, February 14, 2012

"Only a racist would deny that Thomas Jefferson fathered slave children" - True or False ?? - It seems that abolitionists, liberals, libertarians, democrats, republicans, communists, nazis, etc.... give opinions according to their prejudices and purposes

.
Every age and decade has fantasies about the sexual life of Thomas Jefferson. These fantasies tell a lot about the politics of the subject and little about TJ.

Nobody knows for sure if Thomas Jefferson fathered slave children. Science has been unable to solve the mystery, even if Jefferson male genes are involved ( a Y Chromosome ).

I liked the movie in which Thomas Jefferson was a Great Stud. I don't like the idea that Thomas Jefferson was a statue of marble without passions. But I am prejudiced, after all I am a super liberal.

Lawrence Washington, eldest brother of George Washington married a Rich Lady with Black Blood. George was heir to the wealth and the military position of his brother.

Please contribute to this "furious", "passionate" and "crazy" controversy.




Monticello Organization
Plantation & Slavery › People of the Plantation
Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings: A Brief Account


Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings: A Brief Account


***************************

I have to take my medications against craziness, because I am a super Obama Fan, and all the polls, bets, stars, tarots, and crystall balls are telling me that Obama is going to win by a Big Landslide

.
Even the flight of birds and patterns of lightning announce a Big Obama Win in November 6, 2012.

Obama attracts 44% of whites (compared to 43% in 2008) and 79% of non-whites (compared to 80% in 2008). Obama attracts 49% of whites with at least a four year college degree (compared to 47% against McCain) and 41% of whites without one (compared to 40% in 2008)

Against McCain, Obama won 56 percent of women; Pew finds him drawing 59 percent against Romney. Obama is starting to advance in the white working-class "waitress moms" who strongly preferred McCain. Romney's image among independents has sharply deteriorated.

No wonder that Casinos, Gamblers, Bettors and Bookies are betting at a rate of 60% for President Obama. Bet 60 dollars to win 100 minus taxes and fees ( in case that Obama wins reelection ).


National Journal
Obama's Revived Coalition Spells Trouble for Romney
By Ronald Brownstein
February 14, 2012


Obama's Revived Coalition Spells Trouble for Romney


Some excerpts :

Whether the electorate is viewed by race, gender, partisanship or ideology (or combinations of the above), Obama's numbers against Romney now closely align with his support against McCain, according to the 2008 exit polls. Overall, the Pew survey put Obama ahead of Romney by 52 percent to 44 percent, close to his actual 53 percent to 46 percent victory over McCain.
................

Looking at ideology, the reversion to 2008 is almost exact. Against Romney, Pew finds Obama attracting 89 percent of liberals, 20 percent of conservatives (each exactly his share against McCain), and 61 percent of moderates (compared to 60 percent in 2008.) On partisanship, the story is similar: against Romney, Pew finds Obama attracting 9 percent of Republicans (exactly his 2008 share), 51 percent of independents (compared to 52 percent last time) and 94 percent of Democrats (up from 89 percent in 2008). In the Pew survey, Obama wins 46 percent of white independents (compared to the 47 percent he drew against McCain).

The national Pew Research Center poll released Monday confirms that President Obama, at least for now, is reassembling the coalition that powered him to his 2008 victory.

The Pew survey, closely tracking last week's ABC News/Washington Post poll, shows that in a potential general election match-up against Mitt Romney, Obama's support among many of the electorate's key groups has converged with his 2008 showing against John McCain. In almost all cases, that represents gains for Obama since polls from last year.

........

Monday, February 13, 2012

Robert Kuttner : "American productivity has nearly doubled in a generation. The problem is that the fruits of that productivity have gone to the wrong people. Money that might have gone to wage-earners has gone to the top one percent"

.
Huffington Post
Saving the Middle Class
February 12, 2012

By Robert Kuttner
Co-founder and co-editor, 'The American Prospect' - His latest book is "A Presidency in Peril".

Saving the Middle Class

Some excerpts :

The same diligent workers who earned decent wages a couple of generations ago are now working just as hard for a lot less. Workers are better educated than ever. Something has sure changed, but it isn't the work ethic.
..............

The fact is, American productivity has nearly doubled in a generation. The problem is that the fruits of that productivity have gone to the wrong people. Money that might have gone to wage-earners has gone to the top one percent, and to the top one-hundredth of one percent.

It is hard to swallow the idea that today's one percent has higher skills and somehow earned these astronomical rewards. After all, this is the gang whose speculations just crashed the economy. How skilled is that?

The middle of the economy -- factory workers, nurses, technicians, even retail clerks -- work with much more advanced technology than a generation ago. But their wages have lagged. Take a good look at the clerk at the photo counter of your local drugstore, and the technological marvel that she's learned to operate. She's lucky to make nine bucks an hour.

So the question -- the most important economic question of our era -- is how do we make sure that more of society's total product goes to ordinary workers and not so much of it to the one percent?

Better education helps, but it is no silver bullet. In the 1950s, most of the blue collar middle class hadn't even graduated high school, but working people got a much larger share of the total national product.

There are only four ways to do it. We can allocate more of the total product socially, by taxing the best off and using the proceeds to finance expenditures that provide a higher living standard for all. Places like Germany and Canada do that. It doesn't seem to hurt their productivity at all. On the contrary, a more secure population makes for a more reliable workforce.
.................

Sunday, February 12, 2012

Edmond Quincy in "The Atlantic" Magazine in December 1858 : Very Strong and Furious Condemnation of Slavery and the South - This translates by Homology, by a relationship or correspondence to our present History of year 2012

.
My Comment : It may be my sadness or pessimism, but I see in this long writing many of the causes of present day America's Troubles. When a minority wants to dominate a majority of people :



Edmond Quincy (1808 – 1877 ), author and reformer was an abolitionist editor.

In 1837 Quincy joined the Massachusetts Anti-Slavery Society and was corresponding secretary (1844–1853). He became a member of the American Anti-Slavery Society in 1838 and served as vice-president in 1853 and 1856 - 1859. In 1839 he became an editor of the Abolitionist, one of the organs of the Massachusetts Anti-Slavery Society. From 1839 - 1856 he was a contributor to the Liberty Bell (annual), edited by Maria Weston Chapman for the annual anti-slavery fairs. In 1844 he became an editor of the National Anti-Slavery Standard, the organ of the American Anti-Slavery Society. He also edited the Liberator when Garrison was absent (e.g. in 1843, 1846 and 1847).

Quincy was also active in the Non-Resistance Society which condemned the use of force in resisting evil, renounced alliegance to human government, and because of the anti-slavery cause, favored non-union with the American South. He, along with Maria Weston Chapman and William Lloyd Garrison, published the Non-Resistant (1839–1840), which lasted only two years but was indicative of the millennial character of parts of the reform movement.



The Atlantic
Where Will It End?
By Edmond Quincy
December 1858

Where Will It End?


Some excerpts :

He beholds the Southern region, embracing within its circuit three hundred thousand more square miles than the domain of the North, dowered with a soil incomparably more fertile, watered by mighty rivers fit to float the argosies of the world, placed nearer the sun and canopied by more propitious skies, with every element of prosperity and wealth showered upon it with Nature's fullest and most unwithdrawing hand, and sees, that, notwithstanding all this, the share of public wealth and strength drawn thence is almost inappreciable by the side of what is poured into the common stock by the strenuous sterility of the North.

With every opportunity and means that Nature can supply for commerce, with navigable rivers searching its remotest corners, with admirable harbors in which the navies of the world might ride, with the chief articles of export for its staple productions, it still depends upon its Northern partner to fetch and carry all that it produces, and the little that it consumes. Possessed of all the raw materials of manufactures and the arts, its inhabitants look to the North for everything they need from the cradle to the coffin.

Essentially agricultural in its constitution, with every blessing Nature can bestow upon it, the gross value of all its productions is less by millions than that of the simple grass of the field gathered into Northern barns. With all the means and materials of wealth, the South is poor. With every advantage for gathering strength and self-reliance, it is weak and dependent.--Why this difference between the two?

..................

But no such consolations of delusion remain to us, as we stand face to face with the Power which holds our destinies in its hand. None of these blear illusions can cheat our eyes with any such false presentments. No antiquity hallows, no public services consecrate, no gifts of lofty culture adorn, no graces of noble breeding embellish the coarse and sordid oligarchy that gives law to us. And in the blighting shadow of Slavery letters die and art cannot live. What book has the South ever given to the libraries of the world? What work of art has she ever added to its galleries? What artist has she produced that did not instinctively fly, like Allston, to regions in which genius could breathe and art was possible?

What statesman has she reared, since Jefferson died and Madison ceased to write, save those intrepid discoverers who have taught that Slavery is the corner-stone of republican institutions, and the vital element of Freedom herself? What divine, excepting the godly men whose theologic skill has attained to the doctrine that Slavery is of the essence of the Gospel of Jesus Christ? What moralist, besides those ethic doctors who teach that it is according to the Divine Justice that the stronger race should strip the weaker of every civil, social, and moral right?

The unrighteous partiality, extorted by the threats of Carolina and Georgia in 1788, which gives them a disproportionate representation because of their property in men, and the unity of interest which makes them always act in behalf of Slavery as one man, have made them thus omnipotent. The North, distracted by a thousand interests, has always been at the mercy of whatever barbarian chief in the capital could throw his slave whip into the trembling scale of party. The government having been always, since this century began, at least, the creature and the tool of the slaveholders, the whole patronage of the nation, and the treasury filled chiefly by Northern commerce, have been at their command to help manipulate and mould plastic Northern consciences into practicable shapes.

When the slave interest, consisting, at its own largest account of itself, of less than THREE HUNDRED AND FIFTY THOUSAND souls, has _thirty_ members of the Senate, while the free-labor interest, consisting of at least TWENTY-FOUR MILLIONS, SIX HUNDRED AND FIFTY THOUSAND souls, has but _thirty-two_, and when the former has a delegation of some score of members to represent its slaves in the House, besides its own fair proportion, can we marvel that it has achieved the mastery over us, which is written in black and bloody characters on so many pages of our history?
............

Saturday, February 11, 2012

VIDEO, Deep Historical Mormon Racism - Many beautiful and brutal images - Even today Mormon Theology in their scriptures is highly racist - The Mormon prophets and founders Joseph Smith and Brigham Young were super racists

.
Nobody can erase or hide the History of Mormonism as Brutal Racism, Bigotry, Hatred, Prejudice, false notions about races, with lots of violence, approval of slavery and brutality.


Mormons and Racism

Uploaded by jamessanbourne on Jan 20, 2012

This video addresses the question: Are Mormons racist? This excellent short video details the reasons why people keep asking this question


Mormons and Racism



******************

VIDEO, The Brutal Neo-Nazi Republican Party - Ed Schultz, Mike Papantonio, Goldie Taylor denounce the brutal Racism of GOP : Peter Brimelow, Prominent Racist White Supremacist that has many brutal declarations against Blacks, Jews and Latinos, is invited as a very important panelist and guest to speak before CPAC

.
CPAC is the heart and brain of the Republican Party. And this year it had many brutal racists speaking and sitting next to the Republican Candidates.

Uploaded by golefttv on Feb 11, 2012

Log Cabin Republicans weren't welcome at this year's CPAC convention, but White Nationalists were not only welcomed with open arms, but they were given a prime speaking slot. Mike Papantonio appears on MSNBC's The Ed Show to talk about how racism has completely taken over the GOP.


Papantonio: White Supremacist Own the New GOP




**************************

Tuesday, February 7, 2012

Super Conservative "Red State" : Praying for a Brokered Convention : "My sincere and honest hope is that both Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich stay in the race as long as possible to deny Mitt Romney enough delegates to secure the Republican nomination"

.
"I hold out hope that someone or some meteor saves us from ourselves" [The Republicans].

"The Republican Party is putting itself in the hands of the economy. With Mitt Romney as the nominee, we will be forced to hope for a deteriorating economy because, while I will vote for him and think he is vastly better than Barack Obama, the fact is he has made no case for himself against Barack Obama except that he can do a better job on the economy. And let’s be clear — no Republican should hope or appear to be hoping for a deteriorating economy. It’s just that with no other justification for his election other than electability based on the ability to fix the economy, if the economy fixes itself, suddenly there is no justification for Mitt Romney’s electability"

This conservative is saying that Mitt Romney is a disaster for the Republican Party.



Red State
The Sweet Meteor of Death 2012
by Erick Erickson (Diary)
February 6th at 10:31PM EST


The Sweet Meteor of Death 2012


Some excerpts :

"I do not think either Santorum or Gingrich have much of a better shot against Barack Obama, but I do think they are at least running on bigger ideas than Mitt Romney — ideas that still translate and survive an improving economy"

............

For months I have said I am for “Not Romney.” It is not because I think either Gingrich or Santorum have a better shot at winning than Romney, but because I still hold out hope for a broker convention to save us from ourselves.
............

I’ll support the Republican nominee for President. I’ll defend him from meritless attacks and I will oppose Barack Obama. Any one of our candidates is better than Barack Obama. But God help us if any one of them is the nominee.

Until we reach the magic number 1144, which is the number of delegates needed to secure the Republican nomination, I hold out hope that someone or some meteor saves us from ourselves.
.....

Monday, February 6, 2012

Take McCain’s Arizona clout off the ballot and substitute 2012 front-runner Mitt Romney, who has led the pack in calling for strict immigration laws that do not include a path to citizenship for illegals — add in the demographic change — and all of a sudden Arizona is a new swing state

.
Tonawanda News ( New York State )
Immigration, not economy, could tip 2012 election
By Eric DuVall
February 4, 2012


Immigration, not economy, could tip 2012 election


Some excerpts :

If Obama can expand the electoral map to include Arizona it makes New Mexico and Nevada must-win states for the Republican nominee.

Another cause for optimism for Obama: Turnout for Latinos in Arizona is likely to be quite high. The state’s much-derided illegal immigration law, which enables police to demand ID from any person suspected of being illegal (read: any Latino), has energized the state’s Latino voters. Arizona’s Republican governor, Jan Brewer — hardly a popular figure among Latinos after signing the immigration law — did the president yet another favor last week when pictures surfaced of her shoving a finger in Obama’s face as he stepped off Air Force One.

It isn’t all rosy for the president, though. Nevada, home to the nation’s highest unemployment rate, looks to be a tough place for him to campaign and is a prime candidate for a flip from his 2008 electoral map. Other blue states (North Carolina and Indiana) in 2008 will be difficult to hold, making the 2012 contest much closer.

How crucial could the Latino vote in Arizona be in the 2012 contest? Even if Obama loses five states he carried in 2012 — Indiana, North Carolina, New Hampshire, Florida and Nevada — if he wins Arizona and New Mexico, he still wins the election by a count of 291 to 247.

Expect to read a lot more about the Grand Canyon State between now and November.
...............

VIDEO : SEIU = Service Employees International Union begins to attack Mitt Romney as a liar and Hypocrite in Spanish - 2012 SEIU Spanish Language Radio Ad Attacking Romney on DREAM Act and Association With Kris Kobach

.
Thousands of   SEIU members are first language Spanish Speakers :

Translation to English of the attacks of SEIU against Mitt Romney and his lack of character and sincerity - This is not the last union that will attack Romney in English or Spanish ! - Romney appears in many meetings with Kris Kobach the intellectual author of SB 1070 ( the Arizona controversial anti-Immigration law ).

Uploaded by MicEvHill on Feb 1, 2012

2012 SEIU radio ad, run in Florida during the 2012 Florida GOP presidential primary campaign, attacking former Governor Mitt Romney (R-MA) for opposing the DREAM Act and for his association with Kris Kobach, the author of Arizona's SB 1070

ENGLISH TRANSLATION: Mitt Romney has no shame. He shows one face to the Hispanic community and another completely different one to everyone else. On the one hand, he launches a commercial here in Florida targeted to Hispanic voters to try and convince us that he shares our values. But in another state he boasts about having the endorsement of Kris Kobach, a leader in the anti-Hispanic movement and author of many anti-immigrant laws like Arizona's SB 1070 that unfairly attack our families and spread fear and uncertainty in our communities. Romney says he cares about our children, but he has promised to veto the DREAM Act that would open the doors of opportunity for young Hispanics. His Spanish-language ads say Romney "believes in us", but his deeds speak for themselves. Let's not be fooled. He might have two faces, but we know all too well who the true Mitt Romney is. Paid for by SEIU-COPE. SEIU.org. Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.

2012 SEIU Spanish Language Radio Ad Attacking Romney on DREAM Act and Association With Kris Kobach





************************

Saturday, February 4, 2012

American Jobs and Employment : It's not gradually getting better, it's just plain better. Realize that companies have stopped laying off and that others are beginning to hire and that still others, like Home Depot and Halliburton, are hiring like mad

.
We may have reached a bottom and the forecast may be excellent for stocks. The American and World Economies are improving strongly. Prospects good for Obama


The Street
Things Are Better
By Jim Cramer
February 3, 2012

Things Are Better


Some excerpts :


When you are set up to build 13 million cars and it turns out you have to build 14.5 million cars, you need more workers and you aren't going to put them in Mexico given the political instability in the country.

When you haven't built anything of size, whether it be residential apartments or non-residential office buildings, for a half of a decade, there will be pockets of demand. When you find enough oil to reverse a decades-long slide in domestic production, you know you have to hire people to drill it and transport it to pipelines and railroads, which need to be built and trucks, which need to be manufactured and driven.

When Home Depot says it needs more people to meet demand and Chipotle wants to put up many more stores than in previous years and the big mall and shopping center real estate investment trusts are running near full occupancy, people are going to get hired.

That's where we are right now. It's not gradually getting better, as I thought it was. It's just plain better.
............

VIDEO, Mitt Romney, Mormons and Polygamy - Brigham Young : "If you deny Polygamy then you will be damned in Hell" - The Brutality, Violence, Bastardy, Enslavement of Women, Scoundrels, etc ... of Mormonism

.

Scoundrels like "Prophet" Joseph Smith and Brigham Young having unlimited sex with many Women, Women subjected to almost slavery in Mormon harems. Pederasty and Pedophilia with very young girls, 14 years old and of less age.



Uploaded by VorthosForum on Feb 2, 2012

Mormonism, Polygamy...and Mitt Romney




***************************

Thursday, February 2, 2012

Intelligence Study Links Low I.Q. To Prejudice, Racism, Conservatism - "Why might less intelligent people be drawn to conservative ideologies ? Because such ideologies feature "structure and order" that make it easier to comprehend a complicated world"

.
"Are racists dumb? Do conservatives tend to be less intelligent than liberals? A provocative new study from Brock University in Ontario suggests the answer to both questions may be a qualified yes".

My own comment : I have always maintained that Racism is linked not only to low intelligence, but also to psychological disorder, sometimes caused by a dysfunctional childhood with lots of stress.

Failure also breeds monsters, people that have failed a lot in life and become chronic losers can still score points by being racists and "superior" to others like in "White Supremacists". The inferiority complex is a powerful motor of racism.




Huffington Post
Intelligence Study Links Low I.Q. To Prejudice, Racism, Conservatism
February 1, 2012




Some excerpts :

The study, published in Psychological Science, showed that people who score low on I.Q. tests in childhood are more likely to develop prejudiced beliefs and socially conservative politics in adulthood.

I.Q., or intelligence quotient, is a score determined by standardized tests, but whether the tests truly reveal intelligence remains a topic of hot debate among psychologists.

Dr. Gordon Hodson, a professor of psychology at the university and the study's lead author, said the finding represented evidence of a vicious cycle: People of low intelligence gravitate toward socially conservative ideologies, which stress resistance to change and, in turn, prejudice, he told LiveScience.

Why might less intelligent people be drawn to conservative ideologies? Because such ideologies feature "structure and order" that make it easier to comprehend a complicated world, Dodson said. "Unfortunately, many of these features can also contribute to prejudice," he added.

Dr. Brian Nosek, a University of Virginia psychologist, echoed those sentiments.

"Reality is complicated and messy," he told The Huffington Post in an email. "Ideologies get rid of the messiness and impose a simpler solution. So, it may not be surprising that people with less cognitive capacity will be attracted to simplifying ideologies."

But Nosek said less intelligent types might be attracted to liberal "simplifying ideologies" as well as conservative ones.
...........

Dr Death : The epitaph on Kevorkian's tombstone reads, "He sacrificed himself for everyone's rights" - I hope that Liberals, Democrats, and Libertarians celebrate Dr Kevorkian's Life - I do celebrate morphine, even if it speeds death but paliates suffering

.
Democrats, Republicans and Euthanasia - Dr Death and Morphine :

Recently My mother died at 87 and she suffered less thanks to morphine, although one night, because perhaps of religious foolishness she complained a lot and had pains and no morphine was applied.

God bless morphine and I pray all doctors and nurses to push me to the other world. Or better to use the machine of Dr Kevorkian ( Dr Death )

This has to do with the election of year 2012 - Can republicans someday approve Euthanasia and Abortion - It seems that today abortion is a partisan flag and that the Republican Candidates in Primaries compete to see which one is more anti-abortion.

Republicans seem to be enemies of science and doing research on stem cells, placentas, umbilical cords and in vitro experiments.

I wouldn't go so far as to produce clones to extract organs. But who knows what the future brings.


This is my homage to Dr Kevorkian :


Dr Jack Kevorkian in Wikipedia

Some excerpts :

Jacob "Jack" Kevorkian ( 1928 – 2011), commonly known as "Dr. Death", was an American pathologist, euthanasia activist, painter, author, composer, and instrumentalist. He is best known for publicly championing a terminal patient's right to die via physician-assisted suicide; he claimed to assist at least 130 patients to that end. He famously said, "dying is not a crime".

Beginning in 1999, Kevorkian served eight years of a 10-to-25-year prison sentence for second-degree murder. He was released on parole on June 1, 2007, on condition he would not offer suicide advice to any other person.

As an oil painter and a jazz musician, Kevorkian marketed limited quantities of his visual and musical artwork to the public.

Early life

Kevorkian was born in Pontiac, Michigan to Armenian immigrants. His father Levon was born in the village of Passen, near Erzurum, and his mother Satenig was born in the village of Govdun, near Sivas.[5] His father moved from Turkey in 1912 and made his way to Pontiac, where he found work at an automobile foundry. Satenig fled the Armenian Genocide of 1915, finding refuge with relatives in Paris, and eventually reuniting with her brother in Pontiac. Levon and Satenig met through the Armenian community in their city, where they married and began their family. The couple had a daughter, Margaret, in 1926, followed by son Jacob — who later earned the nickname "Jack" from an American teacher who misread the birth certificate[6] — and, lastly, the third child, a daughter, Flora.[7] Kevorkian, who taught himself German and Japanese,[8] graduated from Pontiac Central High School with honors in 1945, at the age of 17. In 1952, he graduated from the University of Michigan Medical School in Ann Arbor. Kevorkian never married.[12] He completed residency training in anatomical and clinical pathology and briefly conducted research on blood transfusion, but was unable to function effectively as a hospital pathologist [13]. Kevorkian left the active practice of medicine and, for a time, was even homeless


In the 1980s, Kevorkian wrote a series of articles for the German journal Medicine and Law that laid out his thinking on the ethics of euthanasia.

Kevorkian started advertising in Detroit newspapers in 1987 as a physician consultant for "death counseling". His first public assisted suicide was in 1990, of Janet Adkins, a 54-year-old woman diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease in 1989. He was charged with murder, but charges were dropped on December 13, 1990 as there were, at that time, no laws in Michigan regarding assisted suicide.[17] However, in 1991 the State of Michigan revoked Kevorkian's medical license and made it clear that given his actions, he was no longer permitted to practice medicine or to work with patients.[18] Between 1990 and 1998, Kevorkian assisted in the deaths of 130 terminally ill people, according to his lawyer Geoffrey Fieger. In each of these cases, the individuals themselves allegedly took the final action which resulted in their own deaths. Kevorkian allegedly assisted only by attaching the individual to a euthanasia device that he had made. The individual then pushed a button which released the drugs or chemicals that would end his or her own life. Two deaths were assisted by means of a device which delivered the euthanizing drugs mechanically through an I.V. Kevorkian called it a "Thanatron" (death machine).[19] Other people were assisted by a device which employed a gas mask fed by a canister of carbon monoxide which was called "Mercitron" (mercy machine).[20]

Criticism and Kevorkian's Response

My aim in helping the patient was not to cause death. My aim was to end suffering. It's got to be decriminalized.

Jack Kevorkian[21]

According to a report by the Detroit Free Press, 60% of the patients who committed suicide with Kevorkian's help were not terminally ill, and at least 13 had not complained of pain. The report further asserted that Kevorkian's counseling was too brief (with at least 19 patients dying less than 24 hours after first meeting Kevorkian) and lacked a psychiatric exam in at least 19 cases, 5 of which involved people with histories of depression, though Kevorkian was sometimes alerted that the patient was unhappy for reasons other than their medical condition. (In 1992, Kevorkian himself wrote that it is always necessary to consult a psychiatrist when performing assisted suicides because a person's "mental state is . . . of paramount importance." [22]) The report also stated that Kevorkian failed to refer at least 17 patients to a pain specialist after they complained of chronic pain, and sometimes failed to obtain a complete medical record for his patients, with at least three autopsies of suicides Kevorkian had assisted with showing the person who committed suicide to have no physical sign of disease. Rebecca Badger, a patient of Kevorkian's and a mentally troubled drug abuser, had been mistakenly diagnosed with multiple sclerosis. The report also stated that Janet Adkins, Kevorkian's first patient, had been chosen without Kevorkian ever speaking to her, only with her husband, and that when Kevorkian first met Adkins two days before her assisted suicide he "made no real effort to discover whether Ms. Adkins wished to end her life," as the Michigan Court of Appeals put it in a 1995 ruling upholding an order against Kevorkian's activity.[22] Furthermore, according to the The Economist: "Studies of those who sought out Dr. Kevorkian, however, suggest that though many had a worsening illness ... it was not usually terminal. Autopsies showed five people had no disease at all. ... Little over a third were in pain. Some presumably suffered from no more than hypochondria or depression."[23]

In response, Kevorkian's attorney Geoffrey Fieger published an essay stating, "I've never met any doctor who lived by such exacting guidelines as Kevorkian ... he published them in an article for the American Journal of Forensic Psychiatry in 1992. Last year he got a committee of doctors, the Physicians of Mercy, to lay down new guidelines, which he scrupulously follows."[22] Fieger stated that Kevorkian found it difficult to follow his "exacting guidelines" due to "persecution and prosecution", adding "[H]e's proposed these guidelines saying this is what ought to be done. These are not to be done in times of war, and we're at war."[22]

In a 2010 interview with Sanjay Gupta, Kevorkian stated an objection to the status of assisted suicide in Oregon, Washington, and Montana. Only in those three states is assisted suicide legal in the United States, and then only for terminally ill patients. To Gupta, Kevorkian stated, "What difference does it make if someone is terminal? We are all terminal."[24] In his view, a patient did not have to be terminally ill to be assisted in committing suicide, but did need to be suffering. However, he also said in that same interview that he declined four out of every five assisted suicide requests, on the grounds that the patient needed more treatment or medical records had to be checked.[25]

Art career

Kevorkian was a jazz musician and composer. The Kevorkian Suite: A Very Still Life was a 1997 limited release CD of 5,000 copies from the 'Lucid Subjazz' label. It features Kevorkian on the flute and organ playing his own works with "The Morpheus Quintet". It was reviewed in Entertainment Weekly online as "weird" but "good natured".[26] As of 1997, 1,400 units had been sold.[26] Kevorkian wrote all the songs but one; the album was reviewed in jazzreview.com as "very much grooviness" except for one tune, with "stuff in between that's worthy of multiple spins."[27]

He was also an oil painter. His work tended toward the grotesque; he sometimes painted with his own blood, and had created pictures such as one "of a child eating the flesh off a decomposing corpse."[16] Of his known works, six were made available in the 1990s for print release. The Ariana Gallery in Royal Oak, Michigan is the exclusive distributor of Kevorkian's artwork. The original oil prints are not for release.[28] Sludge metal band Acid Bath used his painting "For He is Raised" as the cover art for their 1996 album Paegan Terrorism Tactics.[29]

In 2011, his paintings became the center of a legal entanglement between his sole heir and a museum.[30]

Trials

Kevorkian was tried four times for assisting suicides between May 1994 to June 1997. With the assistance of Fieger, Kevorkian was acquitted three times. The fourth trial ended in a mistrial.[2] The trials helped Kevorkian gain public support for his cause. After Oakland County prosecutor Richard Thompson lost a primary election to a Republican challenger,[31] Thompson attributed the loss in part to the declining public support for the prosecution of Kevorkian and its associated legal expenses.[32]

Conviction and imprisonment
Part of a series on Euthanasia

On the November 22, 1998 broadcast of 60 Minutes, Kevorkian allowed the airing of a videotape he had made on September 17, 1998, which depicted the voluntary euthanasia of Thomas Youk, 52, who was in the final stages of Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. After Youk provided his fully informed consent (a sometimes complex legal determination made in this case by editorial consensus) on September 17, 1998, Kevorkian himself administered Thomas Youk a lethal injection. This was highly significant, as all of his earlier clients had reportedly completed the process themselves. During the videotape, Kevorkian dared the authorities to try to convict him or stop him from carrying out mercy killings.

On March 26, 1999, Kevorkian was charged with second-degree murder and the delivery of a controlled substance (administering the lethal injection to Thomas Youk).[9] Because Kevorkian's license to practice medicine had been revoked eight years previously, he was not legally allowed to possess the controlled substance. As homicide law is relatively fixed and routine, this trial was markedly different from earlier ones that involved an area of law in flux (assisted suicide). Kevorkian discharged his attorneys and proceeded through the trial representing himself, a decision he later regretted.[2] The judge ordered a criminal defense attorney to remain available at trial as standby counsel for information and advice. Inexperienced in law but persisting in his efforts to represent himself, Kevorkian encountered great difficulty in presenting his evidence and arguments. He was not able to call any witnesses to the stand as the judge did not deem the testimony of any of his witnesses relevant.[33]

After a two day trial, the Michigan jury found Kevorkian guilty of second-degree homicide.[2] Judge Jessica Cooper sentenced Kevorkian to serve 10–25 years in prison and told him:

This is a court of law and you said you invited yourself here to take a final stand. But this trial was not an opportunity for a referendum. The law prohibiting euthanasia was specifically reviewed and clarified by the Michigan Supreme Court several years ago in a decision involving your very own cases, sir. So the charge here should come as no surprise to you. You invited yourself to the wrong forum. Well, we are a nation of laws, and we are a nation that tolerates differences of opinion because we have a civilized and a nonviolent way of resolving our conflicts that weighs the law and adheres to the law. We have the means and the methods to protest the laws with which we disagree. You can criticize the law, you can write or lecture about the law, you can speak to the media or petition the voters.

Kevorkian was sent to a prison in Coldwater, Michigan to serve his sentence.[34] After his conviction (and subsequent losses on appeal) Kevorkian was denied parole repeatedly until 2007.[35]

In an MSNBC interview aired on September 29, 2005, Kevorkian said that if he were granted parole, he would not resume directly helping people die and would restrict himself to campaigning to have the law changed. On December 22, 2005, Kevorkian was denied parole by a board on the count of 7–2 recommending not to give parole.[36]

Reportedly terminally ill with Hepatitis C, which he contracted while doing research on blood transfusions,[37] Kevorkian was expected to die within a year in May 2006. After applying for a pardon, parole, or commutation by the parole board and Governor Jennifer Granholm, he was paroled for good behavior on June 1, 2007. He had spent eight years and two and a half months in prison.[38][39]

Kevorkian was on parole for two years, under the conditions that he not help anyone else die, or provide care for anyone older than 62 or disabled.[40] Kevorkian said he would abstain from assisting any more terminal patients with death, and his role in the matter would strictly be to persuade states to change their laws on assisted suicide. He was also forbidden by the rules of his parole from commenting about assisted suicide.[41][42]

Activities after his release from prison

Jack Kevorkian answering questions at University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) with lawyer Mayer Morganroth (right) and former Foreign Minister of Armenia, Raffi Hovannisian (left)

Kevorkian gave a number of lectures upon his release. He lectured at universities such as the University of Florida,[43] Nova Southeastern University,[44] and the University of California, Los Angeles.[45] His lectures have not been limited to the topic of euthanasia; he has also discussed such topics as tyranny, the criminal justice system, politics, the Ninth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Armenian culture. He appeared on Fox News Channel's Your World with Neil Cavuto on September 2, 2009 to discuss health care reform.

On April 15 and 16, 2010, Kevorkian appeared on CNN's Anderson Cooper 360°,[46] Anderson asked, "You are saying doctors play God all the time?" Kevorkian said: "Of course. Anytime you interfere with a natural process, you are playing God."[47] Director Barry Levinson and actors Susan Sarandon and John Goodman, who appeared in You Don't Know Jack, a film based on Kevorkian's life, were interviewed alongside Kevorkian. Kevorkian was again interviewed by Cavuto on Your World on April 19, 2010 regarding the movie and Kevorkian's world view. You Don't Know Jack premiered April 24, 2010 on HBO.[48] The film premiered April 14 at the Ziegfeld Theater in New York City. Kevorkian walked the red carpet alongside Al Pacino, who portrayed him in the film.[49] Pacino received Emmy and Golden Globe awards for his portrayal, and personally thanked Kevorkian, who was in the audience, upon receiving both of these awards. Kevorkian stated that both the film and Pacino's performance "brings tears to my eyes – and I lived through it".[50]


2008 Congressional race

See also: United States House of Representatives elections in Michigan, 2008
Wkinews has related news: Assisted-suicide doctor Jack Kevorkian to run for US Congress

On March 12, 2008, Kevorkian announced plans to run for United States Congress to represent Michigan's 9th congressional district against eight-term congressman Joe Knollenberg (R-Bloomfield Hills), Central Michigan University Professor Gary Peters (D-Bloomfield Township), Adam Goodman (L-Royal Oak) and Douglas Campbell. (G-Ferndale). Kevorkian ran as an independent and received 8,987 votes (2.6% of the vote).[51]


Death

Wikinews has related news: Assisted-suicide doctor Jack Kevorkian dies at age 83

Kevorkian had struggled with kidney problems for years.[52] He had recently been diagnosed with liver cancer, which "may have been caused by hepatitis C," according to his longtime friend Neal Nicol.[53] Kevorkian was hospitalized on May 18, 2011, with kidney problems and pneumonia.[2] Kevorkian's conditions grew rapidly worse and he died from a thrombosis on June 3, 2011, eight days after his 83rd birthday, at William Beaumont Hospital in Royal Oak, Michigan.[2] According to his attorney, Mayer Morganroth, there were no artificial attempts to keep him alive and his death was painless.[53] Judge Thomas Jackson, who presided over Kevorkian's first murder trial in 1994, commented that he wanted to express sorrow at Kevorkian's death and that the 1994 case was brought under "a badly written law" aimed at Kevorkian, but he tried to give him "the best trial possible". Kevorkian was buried in White Chapel Memorial Park Cemetery Troy, Michigan.[54]

Legacy

Maria Silveira, a professor of internal medicine, said she became involved with palliative care partly because of the attention Kevorkian brought to the complex issue of unintended suffering, adding that he had a tremendous impact and fueled the public awareness of unintended suffering and the need to address it. "Dr. Jack Kevorkian didn’t seek out history, but he made history," she said.[55] John Finn, medical director of palliative care at the Catholic[56] St. John’s Hospital, said Kevorkian's methods were unorthodox and inappropriate.[55] Geoffrey Fieger, Kevorkian's lawyer in the 1990s, said that Kevorkian revolutionized the concept of suicide by working to help people end their own suffering, because he believed physicians are responsible for alleviating the suffering of patients, even if that meant allowing patients to die.[55] Derek Humphry, author of the suicide handbook, Final Exit, said Kevorkian was "too obsessed, too fanatical, in his interest in death and suicide to offer direction for the nation."[57] Howard Markel, a medical historian at the University of Michigan, said Kevorkian “was a major historical figure in modern medicine."[55] The Catholic Church in Detroit said Kevorkian left behind a "deadly legacy" that denied scores of people their right to humane deaths.[58] Philip Nitschke, founder and director of right-to-die organisation Exit International, said that Kevorkian "moved the debate forward in ways the rest of us can only imagine. He started at a time when it was hardly talked about and got people thinking about the issue. He paid one hell of a price, and that is one of the hallmarks of true heroism."[59]

The epitaph on Kevorkian's tombstone reads, "He sacrificed himself for everyone's rights."
.....